Choosing the right content management system (CMS) for your college or university is the digital foundation that will either empower or frustrate your marketing team for years to come.
Your website is often the first impression prospective students have of your institution. It needs to be impressive, accessible, and seamlessly functional across departments – all while being manageable for your team.
At Manaferra, we’ve helped numerous higher education institutions navigate this crucial decision. Through our experience and extensive research, we’ve created this comprehensive guide to help you understand the CMS landscape and make the right choice for your specific institutional needs.
Open-Source vs. Proprietary
Before diving into specific platforms, let’s understand the current market breakdown:
Open-Source Dominance: Recent analysis shows that 66% of top U.S. universities use open-source CMS platforms (primarily Drupal and WordPress), compared to just 9% on proprietary solutions.
Market Leaders: Among the most prestigious institutions, Drupal is the single most popular CMS (used by ~35% of top universities), followed by WordPress (~18%). Among all higher education institutions (including smaller colleges), WordPress takes the lead with approximately 40% market share.
Proprietary Players: Purpose-built higher-ed solutions like Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni CMS), Cascade CMS, and Terminalfour hold smaller but significant shares (approximately 5-10% each), often serving specific institutional needs.
CMS Market Share in Higher Education
| CMS Platform | Top Universities | All Higher Ed Institutions |
|---|---|---|
| Drupal | 35% | 19% |
| WordPress | 18% | 41% |
| Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni CMS) | ~8% | ~10% |
| Cascade CMS | ~6% | ~8% |
| TerminalFour | ~4% | ~5% |
| Other/Custom | 29% | 17% |
Let’s look at how these platforms stack up against each other:
Top CMS Platforms for Higher Education
1. Drupal: The Enterprise Powerhouse
Market position: Used by approximately 35% of top universities, including all Ivy League schools.
Key strengths:
- Highly scalable and flexible for complex, multi-site environments
- Granular user permissions and robust workflows for multi-department governance
- Strong security track record and compliance capabilities
- Built-in accessibility and SEO tools
- Excellent multi-site and multilingual support
Potential challenges:
- Steeper learning curve for content editors
- Requires developer expertise for customization
- Fewer ready-made themes/plugins than WordPress
Best for: Large research universities, complex multi-college institutions, and organizations with technical resources that need enterprise-grade solutions.
Notable users: University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, and all Ivy League institutions
2. WordPress: User-Friendly and Flexible
Market position: Used by approximately 40% of all U.S. higher education institutions, especially popular among smaller colleges.
Key strengths:
- Very user-friendly editing interface accessible to non-technical staff
- Huge ecosystem of themes and plugins (55,000+)
- Quick to deploy and update with one-click core updates
- Cost-effective for smaller schools
- Multisite network capability for department sites
Potential challenges:
- Security risks if poorly managed (target of ~90% of hacked CMS sites)
- Reliance on third-party plugins for advanced features
- Fewer built-in enterprise features (complex workflows, access controls)
- Performance can degrade without proper caching/CDN implementation
Best for: Smaller to mid-sized institutions, schools with limited IT resources, and marketing-led web teams prioritizing ease of use.
Notable users: University of Washington, Harvard University, Stanford University, many community colleges, and smaller private institutions
3. Modern Campus CMS (formerly Omni CMS): Higher Ed Specialist
Market position: The leading commercial platform in the higher education sector.
Key strengths:
- Designed specifically for higher ed with purpose-built modules
- Intuitive WYSIWYG editor and page templates
- Strong accessibility and governance features
- Excellent vendor support and training resources
- Proven multi-site scalability
Potential challenges:
- License and hosting costs with vendor lock-in
- Limited customization compared to open systems
- The platform interface can feel dated in some aspects
Best for: Institutions seeking a turnkey solution with higher-ed specific features and minimal IT overhead.
Notable users: University of North Texas, Texas Christian University (manages hundreds of sites in one Omni CMS instance), many community colleges
4. Cascade CMS: Structured Content Management
Market position: A significant player in the higher education CMS space.
Key strengths:
- Higher-ed focused with time-saving templates and marketing modules
- Built-in accessibility checker and quality control tools
- Robust permissions and versioning for distributed editing
- Content preview and drag-and-drop editing
- Vendor-managed updates reduce maintenance burden
Potential challenges:
- Significant license cost (often tens of thousands annually)
- Less flexible for deep customization
- Smaller developer community than open-source options
Best for: Universities seeking strong governance and quality control with structured content management.
5. TerminalFour: Marketing-Focused Solution
Market position: Used 250+ higher education clients
Key strengths:
- Purpose-built for higher ed with multi-site management
- Includes personalization and digital marketing tools
- Strong multi-channel support for web, email, and landing pages
- Marketing automation integrations
- Used successfully in hundreds of institutions globally
Potential challenges:
- Proprietary cost and support model
- Interface can be complex, requiring training
- Smaller U.S. presence compared to competitors
- Limited custom development outside of provided features
Best for: Institutions looking to integrate marketing automation with their CMS and prioritizing recruitment campaigns.
Key Decision Factors for Higher Ed CMS Selection
SEO Performance & Flexibility
Search visibility is critical for enrollment marketing. Here’s how the platforms compare:
Drupal offers built-in SEO architecture and taxonomy out of the box. It includes modules for meta tags, XML sitemaps, and structured data, with a semantic content structure that search engines love. Its structured content approach makes it easier to manage rich metadata at scale.
WordPress relies on plugins for most advanced SEO features (like Yoast SEO), but these plugins are powerful and make WordPress SEO accessible even to non-technical editors.
Proprietary CMS options like Modern Campus CMS and Cascade include built-in SEO checks or fields, though they may lack the depth of third-party tools available to open-source systems.
The key takeaway? All these platforms can achieve strong SEO results with proper implementation. The best choice depends on your team’s expertise and needs for automation versus simplicity.
Accessibility Compliance
Accessibility is non-negotiable for higher education websites, which must comply with WCAG 2.1 and Section 508 requirements.
Drupal has been a leader in accessibility, with many features built into the core (accessible admin interfaces, ARIA landmarks, text alternative prompts). The Drupal community has prioritized ADA compliance tools throughout the platform’s evolution.
WordPress strives for accessibility, but much depends on the chosen theme and plugins. It’s fully possible to build a WCAG-compliant WordPress site, but the CMS itself won’t enforce accessibility standards without additional plugins.
Proprietary higher-ed CMS options often include automated accessibility checkers and enforcement:
- Modern Campus CMS has an Accessibility Check tool that scans pages for issues before publishing
- Cascade CMS includes built-in accessibility scanning as part of its content editor
- TerminalFour provides accessibility consulting and tools as part of its platform
Remember that despite CMS features, universities still face challenges in maintaining accessibility due to decentralized content editors, legacy content, and the balance between design flexibility and compliance.
Multi-Site Management & Scalability
University websites are often complex ecosystems with a main site plus sub-sites for colleges, departments, and other units. Managing this efficiently is a key requirement.
Drupal supports multiple sites from a single codebase or within one site via multi-domain setups. Its robust taxonomy and content modeling are ideal for large content inventories.
WordPress has a built-in Multisite mode that allows one installation to host any number of sub-sites – perfect for giving departments their own sites while maintaining centralized control.
Proprietary CMS options are often built specifically for multi-site management:
- Modern Campus CMS allows institutions to manage hundreds of sites in one place, as demonstrated by Texas Christian University
- TerminalFour enables managing multiple sites from a single platform while maintaining brand consistency
- Cascade CMS offers a centralized dashboard and shared asset library for all sites
For content and traffic scaling, Drupal is often favored by high-traffic sites (used by 39% of the top 100 high-traffic universities). WordPress can handle high traffic, too, with proper hosting and caching, but institutions often lean toward the enterprise features of Drupal for extremely large-scale needs.
Security & Compliance
Universities handle sensitive data and are frequently targeted by cyberattacks, making security a critical concern.
Drupal has a strong security reputation and is widely used in higher ed and government because it “values security, scale, ACL, ADA compliance, and workflow management.” Its architecture includes robust user access controls.
WordPress, due to its massive user base, is the biggest target (90% of hacked CMS sites in 2018 were running WordPress). This is partly due to its popularity and partly because many WP sites run outdated plugins or weak passwords.
Proprietary CMS options are less common targets due to their smaller install base. Security often relies on the vendor – Cascade CMS, for example, handles updates centrally to keep all clients on the latest, most secure version.
For compliance considerations (FERPA, GDPR, etc.), all major CMS platforms can be configured appropriately with authentication, SSO integration, and privacy controls.
Ease of Use for Marketing & IT Teams
The usability of your CMS can significantly impact adoption and efficiency across campus.
WordPress is often lauded as “user-friendly, easy to learn, and affordable,” which is ideal for cross-functional teams with varying tech skills. Its intuitive interface allows editors to publish updates quickly without significant training.
Drupal has improved usability in recent versions, but is still considered more “advanced” – powerful but harder for new users. Drupal shines for IT power users but can be made editor-friendly with thoughtful implementation.
Higher-ed specific CMS options emphasize empowering non-technical users:
- Cascade CMS offers an “intuitive interface” and “rock-solid WYSIWYG editor”
- Modern Campus CMS was built for content contributors across campus, with user-friendly page editing and workflow approvals
- TerminalFour has an editor-friendly design with marketing automation features built-in
An important insight: perceived “ease of use” often depends more on implementation than the platform itself. A well-configured Drupal site can be straightforward for editors, while a poorly configured WordPress site might be frustrating.
Performance & Speed Optimization
Fast-loading, responsive websites are crucial for user experience and SEO. Performance depends on both the CMS and how it’s deployed.
Drupal includes internal page caching and supports granular caching for blocks/views. It automatically minifies and aggregates CSS/JS in production mode, typically resulting in smaller page payloads than WordPress.
WordPress core is lightweight but does not include full-page caching by default. However, caching plugins or host-level caching remedies this limitation.
Proprietary CMS options like Cascade and Modern Campus CMS often use a static publishing model, generating flat HTML files on the server. This approach makes page delivery extremely fast but may limit on-demand personalization.
All major CMS platforms can be optimized for high performance with proper configuration, caching, image optimization, and CDN integration.
Total Cost of Ownership
When evaluating CMS options, consider both initial implementation and ongoing expenses.
Open-Source (Drupal, WordPress): The software itself is free, but you’ll likely spend on development, hosting, and possibly premium plugins or support contracts. Costs can range from very low for a simple WordPress site to significant for an enterprise Drupal implementation.
Proprietary (Cascade, Modern Campus CMS, TerminalFour): These have direct licensing costs. Cascade CMS licensing can range between $20,000 to $100,000+ upfront, plus annual fees. Modern Campus CMS is typically subscription-based, with many mid-sized colleges paying in the five-figure range annually.
Consider these additional factors:
- Development & Customization: Open source offers unlimited customization but may require ongoing developer support. Proprietary CMS come with pre-built features but may limit custom functionality.
- Maintenance & Updates: Open source requires resources to apply updates. Proprietary usually includes updates in the license fee.
- Training & Support: Proprietary vendors typically include training, which can ease transition and ongoing usage.
- Hosting & Infrastructure: Costs vary widely based on scale and requirements.
CMS Comparison Chart: Feature Breakdown
To help you evaluate your options at a glance, we’ve created this comprehensive comparison of the top higher education CMS platforms:
| Feature | Drupal | WordPress | Modern Campus CMS | Cascade CMS | TerminalFour |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Cost | Free | Free | $$ | $$ | $$ |
| Ongoing Cost | $ | $ | $$ | $$ | $$ |
| Ease of Use (Editors) | ★★☆ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★☆ |
| Technical Flexibility | ★★★ | ★★☆ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ |
| SEO Capabilities | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★☆ | ★★☆ | ★★☆ |
| Accessibility Tools | ★★★ | ★★☆ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★☆ |
| Multi-Site Management | ★★★ | ★★☆ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★ |
| Security | ★★★ | ★☆☆ | ★★☆ | ★★☆ | ★★☆ |
| Performance | ★★★ | ★★☆ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★☆ |
| Higher Ed Specific Features | ★★☆ | ★☆☆ | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★★★ |
| Community/Ecosystem | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ |
| Developer Availability | ★★★ | ★★★ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ | ★☆☆ |
Legend: ★★★ Excellent, ★★☆ Good, ★☆☆ Fair, ☆☆☆ Poor
Making the Right Choice for Your Institution
After comparing all these factors, how do you decide? Here’s our framework:
Match the CMS to Your Institution’s Profile
Large Research Universities:
- Typically benefit from Drupal’s enterprise-grade capabilities
- Have the IT resources to maintain complex systems
- Need robust multi-site management and governance
- Example users: Harvard, MIT, Stanford, all Ivy League schools
Mid-Sized Universities:
- May find Drupal or Modern Campus CMS appropriate
- Balance between power and maintainability is key
- Need strong departmental permissions but a user-friendly interface
- Example users: Many state universities, private colleges
Small Colleges:
- Often thrive with WordPress or cloud-based proprietary solutions
- Prioritize ease of use and lower maintenance overhead
- Need cost-effective solutions with minimal IT requirements
- Example users: Community colleges, small private institutions
Assess Your Internal Resources
Your team’s composition greatly influences which CMS will work best:
Strong Technical Team:
- Can leverage the power and flexibility of open-source solutions
- Able to customize and maintain complex systems
- May prefer the control offered by Drupal
Marketing-Led Web Team:
- Might prefer WordPress or a proprietary higher-ed-specific CMS
- Values intuitive interfaces and minimal technical barriers
- Needs built-in templates and streamlined workflows
Minimal Web Staff:
- Often benefits from vendor-supported solutions like Modern Campus CMS or Cascade
- Values, training resources, and dedicated support
- May prefer solutions that require less ongoing maintenance
Consider Your Strategic Priorities
Finally, align your CMS choice with your institutional strategic goals:
Enrollment Growth Focus:
- Prioritize SEO capabilities and marketing integration
- Need personalization features for targeted recruitment
- Value integration with CRM and marketing automation
Brand Consistency Priority:
- Need strong multi-site governance and template management
- Value centralized asset libraries and style enforcement
- Benefit from systems with built-in brand guidelines
Accessibility Compliance Mandate:
- Require built-in accessibility checking and enforcement
- Need WCAG compliance tools and monitoring
- Value systems that guide content creators toward accessibility
Total Cost of Ownership Comparison
When evaluating CMS options, understanding the total cost of ownership is crucial. Here’s a breakdown of where your budget typically goes with each platform type:
| Cost Factor | Open Source CMS | Proprietary Higher Ed CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Initial License | $0 | $20,000-$100,000+ |
| Annual License/Support | $0 (community) to $10,000+ (enterprise support) | $5,000-$50,000+ |
| Implementation | $30,000-$250,000+ (varies widely) | $20,000-$150,000+ |
| Hosting | $600-$30,000/year | Often included in the license |
| Internal Staff | Requires more technical expertise | Less technical staff needed |
| Training | Self-directed or consultant-led | Usually included in the license |
| Updates/Maintenance | Requires dedicated resources | Handled by vendor |
Note: Costs are estimates and vary widely based on institution size, complexity, and requirements.
Conclusion
There’s no one-size-fits-all “best CMS” for higher education. The ideal platform depends on your institution’s size, technical resources, marketing goals, and specific needs.
Open-source solutions like Drupal and WordPress continue to dominate the market due to their flexibility and lack of licensing costs. Drupal remains the preferred choice for large, complex institutions with technical resources, while WordPress is favored by smaller schools prioritizing ease of use.
Purpose-built higher education CMS platforms like Modern Campus CMS, Cascade, and TerminalFour offer specialized features and support that many institutions find valuable, especially those with limited technical staff.
Whatever platform you choose, success depends on proper implementation, training, and governance. The best CMS is the one that empowers your marketing team to effectively communicate your institution’s value while being maintainable for your technical team.
Take the Next Step
- Schedule a free 30-minute consultation to review your current program marketing approach
- Subscribe to our newsletter for more insights on higher education marketing
